. >> if you were able to walk nat room like the san francisco chronicle did with their editorial, toss barbara boxer toss carly fiorina we demand new candidates, new debate, then a candidate like yourself becomes far more viable, no? >> the second round. problem is nobody knows what i am, but they know what redo is, reset is play again, and so if, you know, that wins, then it's like the schwarzenegger election, 150 new candidates and pick the one we want. >> interesting comment from thomas friedman today in the "new york times." he says debt and blow and-to-government are symptoms, not causes, i couldn't agree more, symptoms of a country in a state of incremental decline, losing its competitive edge because our politics has become just another form of sports entertainment, our congress a farm of legalized by berry and our main lawmakering institutions divided by toxic partisanship to the point of paralysis. do you see a way forward not the against line but some other solution here that is achievable that is doable? the only thing i can see, if you have a big enough web campaign, raise